As of this post, all major desktop browsers excluding Microsoft IE support the download attribute. It is likely that people who use these browsers would likely rather view the document rather than saving it to their phone. New to HTML 5. This markup is easier to understand and is supported by all modern browsers, but may not be supported by all content management systems.
If for whatever reason, you cannot add the download attribute in the case that you cannot directly edit the HTML of your web page , you can optionally compress the file using zip, and instruct the user to download the zip file.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. How to embed a pdf into a html page for android browsers Ask Question.
Asked 6 years, 4 months ago. Active 6 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 7k times. So, At the moment I embed a base64 encoded pdf into a html page using iframe and I have no problem with this but I want to display it also on android browsers like chrome and firefox. I also tried object or embed tag but none worked.
What should I do? Here's a useful guide to fix the Google Chrome 's annoying 'Managed by your organization' message on Mac. Removing unwanted followers from your Instagram account is quite easy. Here are 5 best ways to remove followers on Instagram.
And it will likely be improved. How many answers to the question in the title do you need? As I understand it users have the option to open the downloaded PDFs using whatever they want and as the author pointed out this can be reverted. Note that this is only lit up in Chrome Canary now. If I have to revert anything it will be of my own doing not someone elses.
Perhaps this is a test of sorts. I think the threat of viruses to regular people and organizations is hard to overstate. Microsoft is catching onto this too. Doug, I have not heard anything new about that. It is unclear whether WebP will be implemented or not, and when it is going to happen if. So if you just click the file as most do it should display in browser. In my corporate environment, we use Acrobat Professional, not some little third-party app.
My workflow is such that there are many corporate PDFs that I want to view quickly in the browser. If I like what I see, then I download it, and often immediately open it back up. I want the downloaded file to open in Acrobat, because it is more convenient for extended viewing, for comparing with other PDFs, and for editing or marking up.
When I publish PDFs using our internal network tools, successive iterations of the file are all published to the same instance or location, so when I am making changes and testing things, previous iterations are overwritten, so I like to download them for comparison. But it changes an established way of working that has been very convenient and provides me no advantage. At the least, I should be allowed to choose whether I want the new behavior or the old behavior.
The point is, the engineers made a change that is good for some people that choose not to be responsible for their own security, but they decided that they would not provide a way to offer the old behavior. And anyway, what business is it of theirs if I choose to engage in unsafe behavior with a third-party app, which is what they are saving me from?
I strongly second this, its a hassle to have to go though extra steps in order to view the PDF in the system viewer. Also I was able to drag a downloaded PDF from the download bar at the bottom of the chrome browser directly into an email being composed in outlook. Now when I do that I get a file path reference link in the email, not an attachment.
Wish I could revert back to the older chrome.
0コメント